This paper deals with the question of neolithisation of Southern Scandinavia. The main goal is to give an overview of three theories regarding how agriculture and livestock breeding was introduced to the Southern Scandinavia. These are as follows: the immigration theory, the socio-economic theory and the historical explanation theory. Furthermore it is investigated which theory has the most probably support in material culture. There are obvious difficulties in interpreting the archaeological material.

One of the most discussed archaeological subjects is the neolitisation, and the start of a neolithic lifestyle which is characterized by several significant events. The traditional view has been that settled people were cultivating and breeding, but this picture has been questioned and changed in later years. The development is principally based on two models; that already neolithic people immigrated and took over, or that the new lifestyle gradually developed out of the existing cultures. Southern Scandinavia was characterized by a settlement pattern with permanent settlements which were complemented by temporary special settlements, but in time more domestic settlements originated. On the British Isles the settlements didn´t consist of permanent agricultural settlements but instead did the people here move freely between several short term settlements.  .

Syftet med denna uppsats var att få en fördjupad kunskap om människans kontroll över hästen under romersk järnålder i Sydskandinavien. Min ingång till undersökningen var utrustningen som hör till hästens huvud, d.v.s. tränset, vilket spelar en betydande roll för kontrollen. Genom framförallt detaljstudier av tränsfynd ämnade jag besvara frågor som i vilken kontext fynden hittas, hur tränsen såg ut, vilka bett man hade och om det går att säga något om ridsättet utifrån tränsen.Slutsatsen blev att tränsen, som oftast påträffas i deponeringar i mossar, inte var helt olika dagens. De bestod av ett huvudlag i läder, ett bett och tyglar.

This essay studies the funnel-beaker ceramic in connection with the megalith graves in South Scandinavia. In my work I have described the nature of ceramics and looked on the crockery types and ornamentation and then discussed the use of the material in a ritual perspective. In the first part I have focused on the critical aspects you have to think about when you do a study like this one. In the second part of this essay I have done a case study, with the ceramic material, in three passages graves in the area of Falbygden, Western Sweden and studied the ceramic material and the nature of it in South Scandinavia as well. Then in the third I discussed the potential use, there is two, of the ceramic material in general of South Scandinavia and looked at it in a ritual perspective..

Many archaeologists have been intrigued by how often symbolic houses of varying forms are used on the burialgrounds of the Scandinavian Bronze Age. Some scholars even claim that to deal with the dead did not mean to set them apart from the world of the living during this period. Since several examples show that there seem to be an active connection between the ship-setting and different types of symbolic houses, this study seek to demonstrate and interpret how the ideology behind these symbols vary between three regionally different Swedish areas: Halland, Småland and Gotland. The purpose is to show that the way chosen to shape the symbols materially not only had fundamental impact on the organization of the burialground itself, but also on how the surrounding world came to comprenhend and use them. This study suggests that even though the special shapes of the graves and the gravefield itself can carry meaning, the materialization of the monuments can be interpreted as incorporated in a practice of remembrance in where the individual shaping of the grave most probably formed part of a greater story..

Vad är materialitet? Denna fråga i kombination med den förhistoriska individen, är något av en utgångspunkt för uppsatsarbetet; materialitetsbegreppet och människans syn på tingen som omgav henne. För en vidare finslipning av syftet med just min uppsats, är det att se hur man uppfattat glas under romersk järnålder i Sydskandinavien. Finns det möjligen skillnader i den geografiska spridningen av glaset, sett ur en estetisk synvinkel?Det teoretiska avsnittet grundar sig på den dialogiska teorin i egenskap av kommunikationsteori ? d.v.s.

Mainly focusing on the big picture regarding the research concerning the religious sphere in Bronze Age Scandinavia, the research field has been missing out on the smaller picture. The results have a tendency to produce a picture where the big landscape monuments, social structures and cosmology appear in the foreground. This essay is a comment to this phenomena and a methodological and terminological discussion regarding the way in which we as archaeologist?s works with questions about religion and rites. The main task though is to make an attempt in trying to identify the ritual performers and to answer the question whether it's possible or not to do that.

De ovala och djurformade skålfibulorna utgör ett komplext och svårtolkat material. Målsättningen med detta arbete har likväl varit att utifrån spännenas utformning och kontext, i och utanför Uppåkra, försöka förstå vilka funktioner de kan tänkas ha fyllt under yngre järnålder. De härstammar från den senare delen av vendeltiden, ca 700-770 e. Kr. och har anförts som föregångare till vikingatidens spännbucklor.