Bedömning förr och nu
En studie i bedömning genom grundskolan
GymnasticPhysical educationCurriculumCurriculum codesAssessmentGymnastikIdrott och hälsaKursplanerLäroplanskoderBedömning
AbstractAimThe aim is that by using the curriculumcodes, analyze and compare four curriculums in physical education. The study begins in the elementary school introduction in 1962, and then makes three more strikes in 1980, 1994 and 2011.The questions that are addressed in this paper are,Which expression of competence code can be found in the different curricular?What are the expressions for performance code can be found in the different curricula?Is there any change regarding which code teachers use when they assess the students?Method As a basis, the four curricula Lgr 62 Lgr 80, Lpo 94 and Lgr 11 in physical education are used. These four curriculums are studied and compared for similarities and changes in the assessment uses comparative content analysis. A number of publications in the curriculum codes are used in the analysis of the curriculum. The publications are based on relevance to the study.Results The study shows examples of the similarities between the syllabuses way to look at how teachers must assess students. You can also see that all four different curricula in physical education is based on the assessment that correspond well with Bernstein's curriculum codes, especially when it comes to performance code. The study also shows that training programs over time have not changed appreciably applicable assessment.Conclusions The syllabuses studied the expression of the same type of performance-based assessment "performance code". In all four curricula studied is the "performance code" that dominates, however, it is possible in Lpo 94 to find a rating criterion that signals "competence code". Moreover study indicates that "competence code" more found in the syllabuses "Goals to strive for" and "Purpose".KeywordsGymnastic, physical education, curriculum, curriculum codes, assessment