Syftet med uppsatsen a?r att beskriva hur fem av Sveriges sto?rsta advokatbyra?er arbetar praktiskt med att motivera sina bitra?dande jurister i yrkesrollen. Uppsatsens teoretiska referensram baseras pa? Maslows behovshierarki. Motivationsarbetet utva?rderas i uppsatsen om det kan bidra till att de bitra?dande juristerna stannar kvar pa? byra?erna eller inte.

De sto?rsta affa?rsjuridiska advokatbyra?erna i Sverige har genomga?tt stora fo?ra?ndringar de senaste decennierna och advokatens yrkesroll a?r i fo?ra?ndring. Byra?erna har blivit mer professionella i strukturen, men dess a?gandeform har la?nge fo?rblivit ofo?ra?ndrad. A?gandeformen besta?r av ett dela?garskap vilket inneba?r att advokatbyra?n a?gs av ett antal advokater som a?ven a?r ansta?llda pa? samma byra?.

This thesis investigates how recipient countries' domestic type of democracy affects its inclusive ownership in international development cooperation. This is done by examining Swedish development cooperation with Rwanda and Tanzania during the period from 2010 to 2014, a time when ownership - a concept which emphasizes recipient countries' leadership over its own development - was a central part of the international development agenda. The two cases were selected through a most similar case design where the value of potential explanatory variables was similar, except for the recipient countries' types of democracy. Furthermore, the case study uses a comparative analysis to analyze strategies and reports done by SIDA and the Swedish Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Previous research focuses on the exclusion that national ownership can result in, in undemocratic national contexts. The main argument for this should be seen as the fact that ownership can not be representative if the power of the recipient's development agenda is limited to a decision-making elite.