Av 35 kap. 2 ? f?rsta stycket r?tteg?ngsbalken framg?r att det inte kr?vs bevis f?r omsta?ndigheter som a?r allma?nt veterliga. Med allma?nt veterliga omsta?ndigheter a?syftas notorisk kunskap, det vill s?ga fakta och erfarenhetssatser som ?r allm?nt k?nda.

Many new surveillance technologies are being rapidly implemented in Sweden. Despite surveillance posing a potential threat to personal integrity, public support for surveillance in Sweden remains strong. However, little attention has been directed towards what causes these attitudes. One possible cause is that Swedish officials have unanimously shifted their framing of surveillance, from emphasising threats to personal integrity to instead emphasising its usefulness to maintain peace and security. According to framing theory, such communication can be used to legitimise policies and sway public opinion.