This essay discusses different opinions about experimental Archaeology. To start with literature was examined and a questionnaire was sent out to students and working archaeologists. The possibility for experiments to mediate Archaeology to people without an education in Archaeology is lifted and is also mentioned in the questionnaire. In the discussion part of the essay the results from the questionnaire and the literature are used to see what opinions are the strongest. The mediating is also discussed and the result is compiled in the conclusion.

This paper explores the theoretical and practical uses and limitations of battle-field Archaeology. The author aims to paint a big picture of the subject of exca-vating, understanding and theorising about historical battlefields done every day by archaeologists. Its approach places much weight on a quantity of examples rather than exploring specific excavations in every detail, in an effort to give the reader an understanding about how battlefield Archaeology works. It stresses the need for battlefield Archaeology as a way of obtaining and securing impor-tant archaeological and historical information before it is lost to science. The author tries to evaluate the subject in a critical and pragmatic fashion in order to establish a clear understanding about the facts of battlefield Archaeology..

This essay is focused on the questions of and responsibility for where, when, how and why communication and meetings through Archaeology should take place. I have critically studied Swedish public Archaeology through three diverse archaeological excava­tions, one took place in the end of the 1980s, and two others in 2012.I have asked for under what circum­stances and with which goals the public efforts become possible. I have inter­viewed leaders for the archaeological excavations and/or the public efforts and questi­o­ned how and why they reached out to the public. I also searched for results and effects in order to problematize and value the public activities.Through interpretation of the resear­ched material it becomes clear that economic issues as well as archaeo­logists interests and engagements are of vital importance for public Archaeology. Co-operation in the local community and archaeological documentation is crucial for the deve­lopment of Archaeology and its role in society.Keywords: Public Archaeology, Community Archaeology, Heritage, Communication, Manage­ment, Historic environment education, Time Travel, Living history.

ABSTRACTDelic, Admira. 2007. Forensisk arkeologi: Har forensisk arkeologi en framtid i Sverige?(Forensic Archaeology: Is there a future for forensic Archaeology in Sweden? C-uppsats i arkeologi. Högskolan i Kalmar ht 2007)This paper is about what forensic Archaeology means, how the work is done, what methods are used in a forensic investigation.

This essay is focused on the questions of and responsibility for where, when, how and why communication and meetings through Archaeology should take place. I have critically studied Swedish public Archaeology through three diverse archaeological excava­tions, one took place in the end of the 1980s, and two others in 2012.I have asked for under what circum­stances and with which goals the public efforts become possible. I have inter­viewed leaders for the archaeological excavations and/or the public efforts and questi­o­ned how and why they reached out to the public. I also searched for results and effects in order to problematize and value the public activities.Through interpretation of the resear­ched material it becomes clear that economic issues as well as archaeo­logists interests and engagements are of vital importance for public Archaeology. Co-operation in the local community and archaeological documentation is crucial for the deve­lopment of Archaeology and its role in society.Keywords: Public Archaeology, Community Archaeology, Heritage, Communication, Manage­ment, Historic environment education, Time Travel, Living history.

This is a paper in human osteology which concerns a paleopathological investigation about a possibly male dwarf from the early middle-age graveyard at the site of Löddeköpinge in Skåne, Sweden..

Denna uppsats behandlar växtfynden som påträffats i gravar i Malmöområdet. Många växter har haft en speciell status, medicinskt som sakralt, vilket är huvudpunkten i arbetet. Varje växtfynd som tas upp analyseras med hjälp av bl.a. material om bondesamhället rörande etnologi och historia..

This thesis deals with the documentation of non-prioritised material during archaeological fieldwork. The main questions are whether there is a difference in the documentation of the non- prioritised material, between rescue Archaeology and research Archaeology and what the reasons for such a difference may be related to. Furthermore, the thesis deals with what arch-aeologists write say and do about the subject. To answer these questions, I analyse three different projects; Two research projects, Zvejnieki (Latvia) and Monte da Igreja (Portugal), and one rescue archaeological project, Gyllins Trädgård (Sweden).The most important result is that there is as great a difference between the two research projects as there is between the research projects and the rescue archaeological project. Many similarities can be seen in the projects conducted at Monte da Igreja and Gyllins Trädgård.

The Swedish Library Classification System, known as the SAB-system, can be viewed as a product of the cultural and social norms and values in Sweden during the time in which it was created and subsequently reviewed. The main purpose of this master?s thesis is to examine the Archaeology section J in the SAB-system, in order to observe if values and norms within this discipline had any impact on the Swedish Library classification system. Our intention is therefore to verify any correspondence between the choice of topics and hierarchical structure of that section, and the values and norms that ruled the Swedish society during the 20th century at large but with particular emphasis to the academic discipline of Archaeology. At the present, Archaeology is often disputed as a value-free interpretive science.

In my essay I will study the injustice within science in movies, in this particular case: Archaeology. This essay will also examine whether there is reason to believe that there is aconnection between this unfairness and what's being displayed of the archaeologist in popular culture. In my case I have decided to focus on the movie industry because it's a dominant part of our daily life. I have chosen to explore two different groups of students studying an occupation. One is, of course, the archaeological institution at Lund University, and the other is a high school (upper secondary school) program called ?Omvårdnadsprogrammet? at Rönnens in Malmö.

Industriarkeologi är en relativt ny gren inom vetenskapen: den kombineras ofta med byggnadsarkeologi för att kunna få en så fullständig bild av objektet som möjligt. Bränneriet i Hyby är ett fullständigt nedgånget industriminne som förutom en fullständig renovering behöver dokumenteras. Det är det som denna rapporten gör, dokumenterar ett industriminne..

This essay contains a study of the traces of trauma on the osteological material from St.Andre in Lund, which were fund durning an excavation in the year 2002, as well as a study of the age and sex distribution of this material. The propose of the essay is to discuss the occurrence of the violence in a urban environment..

The views on and the knowledge of the introduction of iron to Scandinavia have change by the history of Archaeology. The results and discussions are put in the context of time and how that time is reflected in their work and texts. This limits that scholars put up to orientate themselves conceal the complex reality. The limits are changing all the time and is dependent of time and person..

I det här arbetet undersöker jag vilka funktioner mänskliga kvarlevor har i arkeologiska utställningar. Jag för också en diskussion om möjliga alternativ till mänskligt material i utställningar och hur olika utställningar förhåller sig till den etiska diskussionen bland arkeologer kring hanteringen av mänskliga kvarlevor..

For some time now, there has been a debate concerning the relationship between the Cultural Heritage of Sweden and the public. It is said that mediation has been, and still is a, one-waydialog between the two. As a result, people have found a new way to interact with our heritage, thru cultural tourism. This area has been blamed for commercializing our CulturalHeritage, but also ignoring the great problems concerning fragile monuments and sites, which can be destroyed by tourism. Is it possible to find a solution regarding these problems, andcan these two areas benefit from each other?.