Kungsmarken, a apartment area in Karlskrona has suffered the medias prying eye for decades. Today the area only maintains a very low position of status in the livinghierarchy in the community. The area in question was a part of the "Miljonprogrammet" and apperantly has suffered the same consequenses as similar areas since it was built. The onesided negative discourse that has persecuded areas of Miljonprogrammet, such as Kungsmarken, has put social problems as criminality, drugaddiction, dependancy on the social welfare system or cultural incompetence in the focus. The author´s previous understanding of the phenomena lies in private experience from living in Hjällbo, a similar area in Gothenburg also with the miljonprogram.

Today, almost every visit to a website starts with a choice. Before users can read news, shop,search for information or use a service, they are often asked to accept, reject or change cookiesettings. These choices may seem small and quick, but they are connected to larger questionsabout personal privacy, trust and control over personal data.This study examines how Swedish students relate to personal privacy online, with a specialfocus on cookie consent. The aim is to understand how students handle cookie banners ondifferent types of websites, how they reason about privacy and trust, and what knowledgethey have about data collection. The study is based on three research questions: how studentshandle cookie consent on different websites, how they reason about privacy and trust online,and what knowledge they have about the meaning and consequences of sharing personal data.The study is based on two theories: Privacy Paradox and Bounded Rationality.