1999 auktoriserade FN:s säkerhetsråd fredsinsatsen där UNMIK fick mandat attpolitiskt administrera och bygga upp provinsen Kosovo. Vår uppsats syftar till attstudera de etniska motsättningarna mellan kosovoalbaner och serber i Kosovounder UNMIK:s styre och även att studera UNMIK:s hantering avmotsättningarna samt de båda gruppernas förhållande till UNMIK. Vi gör dettagenom en beskrivande fallstudie som främst inriktar sig på vetenskapliga artiklaroch rapporter. Vi granskar hur de etniska motsättningarna har fått negativakonsekvenser för freden i Kosovo. Det har bildats en partition mellan de bådagrupperna och etniskt motiverat våld har förekommit.

In my paper I have examined the United Nations role in the democratization of Kosovo. In order to complete this purpose I have asked two questions? How has the UN contributed to the democratization of Kosovo that has taken place so far?? What advantages and/or disadvantages has the UN presence in Kosovo had from a democratic perspective?The method I have used in my paper is a qualitative one, and more specified a qualitative text analysis. This means that I have examined a rather small number of sources, but in return I have analyzed these sources very carefully. In addition to the choice of a qualitative method I have used Robert A.

This thesis is about how nationalism is constructed from two competing groups, Kosovo Albanian and Serbs. Kosovo for Serbs is a deep symbolic value that continues to be a Serbian identification. This is one of the main reasons why no Serbian politician has the courage to give it up. On the other side of the coin we have the Kosovo Albanians that only settles for independence. To recognize the independence for Kosovo could jeopardize the security for the Serbian minority living in Kosovo.