Titel               Sverigedemokraterna och Fremskrittspartiet - En kvantitativ innehållsanalys om två kvällstidningars rapportering om Sverigedemokraterna och Fremskrittspartiet efter valet 2014 respektive 2013. Författare      Julia Alner och Rebecca Nygren Kurs              Medie- och kommunikationsvetenskap (61-90) 30 hp Termin           Vårtermin 2015 Syfte             Syftet med uppsatsen är att genom en kvantitativ innehållsanalys se hur reaktionerna efter det norska och svenska valet såg ut i den norska tidningen Verdens Gang och den svenska tidningen Aftonbladet. Undersökningen görs genom att applicera teorierna Dagordningsteorin och Gestaltningsteorin. Vi vill se om det finns några skillnader eller likheter i hur den svenska tidningen Aftonbladet skriver om Sverigedemokraterna en månad efter det senaste riksdagsvalet 2014 och hur den norska tidningen Verdens Gang skriver om den norska motsvarigheten Fremskrittspartiet en månad efter det senaste valet i Norge 2013. Nyckelord     SD, Sverigedemokraterna, Frp, Fremskrittspartiet, medierapportering, politik, kvällspress Metod           Kvantitativ innehållsanalys Material         Artiklar i Aftonbladet tidpunkten 2014-09-15 ? 2014-10-14 där orden ?SD? eller ?Sverigedemokraterna? finns med samt artiklar i Verdens Gang tidpunkten 2013-09-10 ? 2013-10-09 där orden ?Frp? eller ?Fremskrittspartiet? finns med. .

The focus of this study is the ways in which the discourses of the three largest right-wing populist parties in Scandinavia ? Danish Dansk Folkeparti, Norwegian Fremskrittspartiet and Swedish Sverigedemokraterna ? are articulated and on defining which individuals they include and exclude. The discourses of the three parties are compared and analyzed to determine whether they constitute specific nationalist and culturally racist discourses. The problem is addressed by applying a social constructivist theory of nationalism and cultural racism, and specifically the binary opposition ?we? and ?them?, on a material consisting of the respective parties? member magazines from 2007.

In this paper I propose a definition on what right-wing populism is, by comparing three right-wing populist parties; the Swedish Democrats in Sweden, the Danish Folks Party in Denmark and the Progress Party in Norway. This is also my question formulation. I have used the idea analysis to straighten out the concept of right-wing populism. The purpose of this paper is to make a definition of the concept of right-wing populism, since one seldom speaks of what right-wing populism is but rather only uses it with parties who want to decrease immigration. However is it much more to a right-wing populist party than just the immigration question.      I begin by discussing the previous research about populism and right-wing populism to see what conclusions previous researchers have made.

The purpose of this study is to present populism as a political phenomenon and to impose focus on the rightwing populist parties that are active in Scandinavia. This essay begins with a presentation of the three rightwing political parties in Scandinavia. The rightwing populist parties have successfully developed their rhetoric and effectively influenced the political establishment in Sweden, Norway and Denmark. The parties that the essay focuses on are theSwedish democrats (SD), the Norwegian Progress party (FRP) and the Danish People`s party (DF). These parties are interesting in the sense that they share many opinions and are active in comparable political atmospheres, but also that they use approximately the same rightwing populist rhetoric as a way of exerting leverage on political policy.The theoretical segment is constructed on a descriptive historical background of populisms three different phases.